An AI avatar attempted to argue a case before a court in New York. The judges were not having it. [Spanish]

Author: California Corresponsal | Source: esdelatino.com | Read the full article in Spanish

In a surprising incident at a New York appeals court, a man attempted to present his case using an artificial intelligence-generated avatar instead of a real lawyer. During the hearing, judges quickly realized that the individual on the video screen was not a real person but a digital creation. The man, Jerome Dewald, was representing himself in an employment dispute and thought the avatar would help him deliver his arguments more smoothly.

The judges were not pleased with this approach, as they felt misled by Dewald's use of the AI avatar. One judge expressed frustration, stating that it would have been better to know about the avatar beforehand. Dewald later apologized, explaining that he had no legal representation and believed the avatar would enhance his presentation.

This incident highlights the growing intersection of artificial intelligence and the legal field, raising questions about the appropriateness of using such technology in court. While some legal professionals have faced consequences for relying on AI tools, others are exploring innovative uses, such as AI avatars summarizing court decisions for the public. The evolving landscape of AI in law continues to spark debate and curiosity.

[Read More (translated)]