[Guest Article] AI Art Delayed in Legal Interpretation Causes Confusion in Creation and Distribution [Korean]

Author: 박정인 교수 | Source: 뉴스핌 | Read the full article in Korean

The article discusses the evolving role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of art, highlighting the ongoing debate about its implications for creativity and originality. It points out that while AI can generate artwork by analyzing existing data and patterns, it fundamentally lacks the emotional depth and personal experiences that characterize human-created art. The author emphasizes that AI's creations are essentially combinations of existing styles rather than truly innovative works.

Furthermore, the article raises important questions about the legal status of AI-generated art. Currently, there is uncertainty regarding whether these works can be recognized as copyrightable material, especially if they lack significant human input. The author argues for the need for clearer legal frameworks to address the challenges posed by AI in the art world, particularly as AI art platforms become more prevalent.

In conclusion, while AI can serve as a valuable tool for artists, the article asserts that the essence of creativity—rooted in human experience and intention—remains irreplaceable. The discussion calls for a balanced approach to integrating AI into the art community, ensuring that the unique qualities of human artistry are preserved and respected.

[Read More (translated)]